The Anthropic IPO: Bizarre and Immensely Important

I’ve spent decades of my life packaging, offering, buying, selling and analyzing IPOs. I’ve never seen anything remotely similar to Anthropic. I’ve never before considered the success or failure of an Initial Public Offering (IPO) critical to the direction of the US economy. I’ve never seen a company that grew that fast to get that big, because neither has anyone else. But I’ve also never seen a mega-cap IPO where the company sells a product that has demonstrated such little pricing power, or one that has seen its meteoric growth so rapidly decelerate BEFORE the offering. I’ve also never seen an S-1 (SEC registration statement that all companies must file prior to an IPO) where there is so much complexity that trained analysts can’t agree on a number for basic metrics in the financial statements. Was the company profitable in the second quarter? That depends on whom you ask. How did the company do in the third quarter? They didn’t say.

The US economy is reliant on the continued growth of the AI infrastructure buildout. That buildout is largely reliant on just a few companies’ ability to keep raising equity and debt. Anthropic needs (by one estimate) $80B annually to finance the commitments they have made to secure computing power. If costs rise to attain that capital either via higher cost debt or more dilutive equity offerings, the sustainability of the AI buildout weakens. I know I’m not breaking new ground in economic thought here that the US economy is reliant on the capital markets remaining exuberant, but my point is that this company alone, along with this IPO is a linchpin to the whole thing. It is critical to the entire AI investment thesis, across that spectrum, that the business model of Anthropic is durably viable. If this financing goes badly, all future AI related financings get tougher. Psychology can change fast. The opposite is also true, if Anthropic flies off the shelves and remains buoyant, you will likely see a lot of companies raise capital in that wake.

Anthropic is a growth company, in fact, as I said earlier, it has grown revenue faster and higher than any other company in history. But then came the third quarter. This past summer we saw the rapid rise of high performance open-weight Chinese models gaining market share and driving down the price of tokens for everyone. Token pricing has now fallen about 90% with no clear bottom in sight. This past summer also brought an end to the concept of token maxing where enterprise employees were incentivized to use as much AI as possible regardless of whether anything productive came from it. Lastly, the summer has made it clear that we are in an era of AI experimentation. When an exciting new model is launched like the Anthropic’s Fable 5 in June (2q), engineers are quick to adopt and look for ways the new model can be additive or bring new efficiencies to workflows, but after a few weeks, demand tails off and migrates to a newer model. Unfortunately for Anthropic, that new model may be an open weight version/imitation unnervingly similar to what Anthropic just a month ago launched but at significantly lower prices. We have essentially learned that the moats are shallow and the honeymoon periods for new models are shorter and shorter. We don’t yet know yet how exactly much growth slowed but no one seems to question that a very significant deceleration has occurred.

While talk of a $2 Trillion valuation has migrated down to talk of a $1.5T valuation, we are still talking about a double-digit multiple of now flatlining revenues. I’m sure bankers at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs will put together eye-watering pro forma models that will assume the company resumes its exponential growth. That’s what they do. That, however, should not reassure anyone for a minute that they themselves believe those numbers. The Chinese wall between banking and research might be 10 feet thick, but that doesn’t mean both sides of that wall don’t understand how the game is played. That said, perhaps growth will resume and reaccelerate. This era of AI growth is a new, highly dynamic paradigm. It’s just that, it doesn’t usually go that way.

In the end, what you are buying is a story, one that may come true and one that may not. Neither I, nor the CEO of Anthropic, or Wall Street’s masters of the universe have any idea what this company will earn three or five years from now. But, fortunately for Anthropic, we live in a time where the more fantastical the story, the bigger the hype, the bigger the potential addressable market, the bigger the valuation. The Musk playbook to downplay the near-term to focus on the potential in ten years is, for now, a winning playbook. I offer no recommendation. The stock may rip higher post-IPO and it could collapse. Neither would surprise me. My only recommendation is that if you do get involved, have a predetermined process in place to manage risk.

WealthVest makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made in this material, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of Tim as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of WealthVest and are subject to change at any time without notice. WealthVest does not have any responsibility to update this material to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this material will continue.

Statements made in this material are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed in this material, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. WealthVest does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This material does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by WealthVest.

Certain statements made in this material may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.

The S&P 500® is a trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC and its affiliates and for certain fixed index annuity contracts is licensed for use by the insurance company producer, and the related products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC or their affiliates, none of which make any representation regarding the advisability of purchasing such a product. WealthVest is not affiliated with, nor does it have a direct business relationship with Standard & Poors Financial Services, LLC.


Tim Pierotti, Chief Investment Strategist

Tim Pierotti is WealthVest’s Chief Investment Strategist. Tim has over 25 years of experience in various aspects of the equities business.  Prior to joining WealthVest, Mr. Pierotti spent seven years in Equity Research management roles at Deutsche Bank and most recently at BMO where he was a Managing Director and Head of US Product Management.  Tim has 11 years of investment experience most notably as Head of Consumer Research and Portfolio Manager at The Galleon Group, a former NY based $8Bln Long/Short hedge fund.  Tim is a graduate of Boston College and lives in Summit NJ.

Next
Next

Five Narratives for the Bond Beatdown